The NFL salary cap is calculated based on a percentage of projected gross revenues for that league year. The 2020 cap has already set at $198.2 million, but with stadium capacity bound to be limited throughout the upcoming season (and thus revenues all but certain to come in under projections) speculation has begun to arise that the salary cap will drop for just the second time since it was implemented in 1994 come 2021 (as the delta between projected and actual revenues would be deducted from the '21 cap). NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport recently suggested that the revenue lost in 2020 could result in a decline of “$40 million or a lot more per team” the following season.
Our Take: The NFL and NFLPA have not yet engaged in serious discussions about how they plan to manage a revenue shortfall in 2020 as the focus to date has primarily been on addressing player health and safety concerns. Once the two sides can agree on those protocols, the owners are expected to present the the NFLPA with updated financial projections for the 2020 season (accounting for COVID's anticipated impact) and discussions about how to ‘smooth the cap’ in 2021 can commence. It’s unclear where Rapoport's $40 million estimate came from. The NFLPA has yet to see an official forecast of the anticipated lost local revenues.
The NFL collective bargaining agreement was ratified in 2020 (it now runs through 2030), so unlike with MLB where the players are concerned any concessions they make now could impact upcoming labor talks, long-term peace exists between the two sides. That should allow the NFL owners and NFLPA to work towards a solution that would prevent a drastic decline in the ‘21 salary cap without worrying about how it might impact the league’s economic model moving forward. Of course, that doesn't mean it's going to be an easy negotiation. Brian Murphy (CEO, Athletes First) said “[the NFLPA] has to go to the negotiating table to fix the salary cap issue. While they’re there, it's likely that some team owners will use that opportunity to try and renegotiate the CBA and claw back some of the [revenue] pie.”
The reason the NFLPA needs to return to the negotiating table is because they desperately want to avoid a significant fall off in the 2021 salary cap as it would all but certainly result in teams having to blow up their rosters (i.e. release highly paid veteran players). The players also want to avoid a scenario where next year’s free agent class is forced to absorb the full brunt of the COVID’s economic impact on the game. The NFLPA would prefer to reallocate money from either this year or from future years to 'smooth the cap'.
The most likely scenario is the two sides borrowing money from future seasons (remember, the league is expected to see a dramatic rise in broadcast revenues following the ’22 season). It reasons to believe the owners would prefer to finance their losses over several years - years when they'll be making even more money - than having to absorb them all in 2020. One solution the NFLPA is not interested in is a reduction in their share of overall revenues. The players fully intend on retaining 48% of total revenues regardless of what the cap number ends up being in 2021.
Despite starting in the midst of a global pandemic, more money was spent in NFL free agency this offseason than any other. That would indicate that the current freeze on free agent signings has more to do with an inability for teams to get players to their facilities than questions related to the 2021 salary cap (though that's not helping). It’s believed once the clubs receive the green light to reopen facilities and players/agents have a better idea of what the cap will look like (i.e. as we get closer to training camp) in future seasons free agency activity will resume. Murphy suggested that guys with one year left on their deals could also be among those looking to sign long-term extensions later this summer. “If next year’s salary cap is reduced, players may not be able to get the same deals that are available to them now. [Those guys] may be better off renegotiating now as they can eliminate all of the risk tied to COVID and a potential decrease in the salary cap; and there’s always the risk of injury or subpar play [that too can be eliminated by signing now].”
Assuming the two sides can 'flatten the cap', the revenue losses suffered during the 2020 season should not have any impact the clubs' use of the franchise tag next offseason. While the average salaries of the top 5 players in the league might not increase in 2021, keeping the cap at the same level ensures the price of the tag won’t be dropping off either. (i.e. it’s not as if teams will be able to hold on to players at less than market value).
It's worth noting that the anticipated revenue shortfall is not the reason the 2020 rookie class has been slow to sign (just 2 first round picks are under contract). As Murphy said, “the rookie pool has already been defined and their cap space has been allocated by the teams.” It's more likely that the lack of urgency has to do with players still not permitted at team facilities and the NFLPA's opposition to some of the provisions teams are looking to include in rookie contracts.
Editor Note: Please note that joining our community (below) will entitle you to receive our free daily sports business email newsletter.
"smooth" - Google News
June 15, 2020 at 06:15PM
https://ift.tt/37uEjk5
NFL/NFLPA Could Borrow Money From Future Seasons to 'Smooth' '21 Cap - Sports Illustrated
"smooth" - Google News
https://ift.tt/30JhCVH
Shoes Man Tutorial
Pos News Update
Meme Update
Korean Entertainment News
Japan News Update
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "NFL/NFLPA Could Borrow Money From Future Seasons to 'Smooth' '21 Cap - Sports Illustrated"
Post a Comment